Tuesday
6/25/2013 6:49 AM
I’ve
noticed that as I age some issues that I once saw as black at white seem to be
varying shades of gray. I have usually
chalked up this change in my point of view to the fact that I am more informed
and educated about things than I was previously. This morning I read an excerpt from the book Gracias! by Henry Nouwen that makes me
reconsider this idea. He writes, “One of
the temptations of the middle class is to create large gray areas between good
and evil. Wealth takes away the sharp
edges of our moral sensitivities and allows a comfortable confusion about sin
and virtue. The difference between rich
and poor is not that the rich sin more than the poor, but that the rich find is
easier to call sin a virtue. When the
poor sin, they call it a sin; when they see holiness, they identify it as
such. This intuitive clarity is often
absent from the wealthy, and that absence easily leads to the atrophy of the
moral sense.”
Perhaps
what I perceive as my educated, enlightened point of view is really the
atrophying of my moral sense, my way of creating confusion about sin and virtue
or my way of salving a guilty conscience.
Jesus warned about the difficulty for a rich person to enter the kingdom
of heaven. Maybe this is one of the
hurdles that get in the way.
I live
in a culture dominated by wealth, power and influence. Christians who speak God’s truth into that
kind of culture are often perceived as fanatics. I do not want to be lumped into that same
category because that type of fanatic often seems to be devoid of love. I wonder if my blurring of the boundaries of
sin and virtue are my attempt at fitting in with society while disassociating
myself with the fanatics. God’s call to
me is to be holy, that is, set apart from the culture around me. How much of my desire to fit in goes against God’s
desire for me to be set apart?
No comments:
Post a Comment