Thursday 5/30/2013 9:01 AM
I recently read the book Quantum Leap, the story of John Polkinghorne, a nuclear physicist
and Anglican priest who has reconciled his life of faith in God with his work
in science. I have also read the books Coming to Peace with Science by Darrel
R. Falk, a biologist, and The Fourth Day
by Howard Van Til, an astronomer. As
scientists they, too, attempted to reconcile their scientific endeavors in
their respective fields with their faith in God as creator.
There are many in both the scientific and the Christian
communities who would suggest that the realms of science and faith have nothing
to say to the other. Scientists find
Christians to be misinformed ignoramuses who need to leave their noses out of
science and Christians feel threatened by theories of evolution, be it stellar
or biological, thinking somehow that would eliminate the need for God. There are strong feelings
on both sides of the issue and vitriolic language and behavior spew from both
sides.
I believe that God
reveals himself in both the Bible and in his creation. In Reformed circles, of which I am a part,
these are called God’s special revelation and God’s general revelation
respectively. It seems to me that if God
is revealing himself to mankind through both means there should be a common
message rather than a divided one. As
Christians, I believe we should do all we can to inform ourselves with regard
to both the Bible and the sciences so that we can wrestle intelligently with
whatever paradoxes seem to arise.
Unfortunately, too often Christians are ignorant of both what the Bible
and what the sciences say. We need to search
for the truth of God wherever it can be found and not shy away from the
difficulties that may arise as we seek to reconcile any discrepancies.
In 1 Corinthians,
Commentary, William F. Orr and
James Arthur Walther suggest a similar tack.
They write, “One who participates in the life of the Spirit in the
Christian fellowship examines all things, is free to investigate all things
pertaining to God. Paul proposed that
there should be no censorship nor obstruction to the systematic search for
truth. This implies that the spiritual
person is capable of evaluating properly the good and evil he confronts, of
estimating what things are worthwhile and what things are not.” I wish the Christian community, as a whole, would
be less defensive of God and less offensive to the scientific community and
have the courage to engage in reconciling the findings of science with their
knowledge of God, as Polkinghorne, Falk and Van Til have done.
No comments:
Post a Comment