Saturday 3/14/2015 6:02 AM
Our modern world seems to be governed by fear; at least in
my corner of the world this seems to be true. News reports are filled with
murders, suicide bombings, kidnappings, threats of nuclear proliferation,
unrestrained religious fanatics gruesomely murdering their captives and
mercilessly attacking villages, and other such acts of violence. In that kind
of a world one feels vulnerable, almost as if one is living on borrowed time.
We hunker down and isolate ourselves in our houses, barring the windows and
doors to keep the evil from reaching us. Our government creates the Department
of Homeland Security to protect us from threats, both foreign and domestic.
Everyone is viewed with suspicion even though we are all in the same situation,
experiencing the same threats.
Today I read the writing of John Mogabgab in which he
writes about vulnerability. “Recently a workshop leader invited participants to
voice their associations with the word vulnerability.
Responses included adjectives such as meek, intimidated, naïve, inferior, ugly
and foolish. Vulnerability is not seen as a gift to be given but a weakness to
be overcome. Not vulnerability but security is the ideal that most often
governs our national, communal, and personal decisions. Perhaps one of the
greatest sources of loneliness in contemporary life is that our vulnerability,
which unites us in a common humanity and enables us to be woven together in
love, now is cause for our isolation in fear-filled cells of spiritual solitary
confinement.”
I would argue that this feeling of isolation is not simply
one of spiritual solitary confinement but also of social solitary confinement.
Earlier this morning I read an article written by Johann Hari based on his
book, Chasing the Scream: The First and
Last Days of the War on Drugs, in which he cites research that suggests
that addictions of all sorts are caused, not by chemical hooks that attach to
receptors in our brains, but, by the effects of an individual living in
isolation from community. When those suffering from addictions become part of a
community in which they have a meaningful role they are more likely to be able
to recover from their addiction and become a contributing member of the
community. It seems that Hari’s observations are illustrated perfectly in
groups like Alcoholics Anonymous and other similarly structured groups in which
members become vulnerable with each other and, through the support of the
group, are enabled to overcome the addiction.
The society in which I live is fiercely independent.
Individual rights are placed above nearly everything else, resulting in pockets
of isolated individuals that have a hard time seeing themselves as members of a
larger community. Those with differing opinions, customs, cultures, and so
forth, are seen as enemies to be avoided and overcome rather than sources of growth,
enlightenment, enrichment, and healing. We want to appear strong and invincible
to others, insisting our way is the best way, my way or the highway. I wonder what
would happen if we would share the doubts that we all have deep within our
hearts with others? Perhaps we could learn from each other and we could be
released from our loneliness, the cultural addiction and solitary confinement
to which we have all been sentenced.
No comments:
Post a Comment